Prompt
Act as a senior logo critic and brand design reviewer.
Review this logo direction and provide a rigorous critique.
Context:
- Brand name: [name]
- Audience: [who this serves]
- Brand traits: [3-5 traits]
- Logo description or image notes: [describe mark, wordmark, colors, proportions]
- Primary use contexts: [app icon, website header, social avatar, print]
- Competitor set: [competitors]
Evaluate across:
1. Brand Fit (does it match desired personality?)
2. Distinctiveness (does it avoid category clich?s?)
3. Legibility (small sizes, low contrast, quick glance)
4. Scalability (favicon to billboard)
5. System Readiness (can it support lockups and variants?)
6. Risk of Misinterpretation (unintended meanings or ambiguity)
Return:
- Top 5 issues ranked by severity
- Specific refinements for each issue
- A before/after recommendation table
- 3 fast A/B tests to validate improvements
- A final go/no-go recommendation with confidence level
Be direct and specific. Avoid generic design advice.How to use
- 01
Include a detailed logo description or upload screenshots for better critique quality.
- 02
Run critique before stakeholder presentation so major issues are resolved early.
- 03
Ask for revised options after critique by saying "Generate 3 improved variants based on these fixes."
Tips
- Add your competitor set to get stronger distinctiveness feedback.
- Request minimum-size and monochrome checks to catch practical implementation issues.
- Use the A/B tests section to validate choices with real users instead of relying only on internal opinion.