Overview
How might we design message reactions so people can trust and act on AI output?
When to use
- Perfect for conversational AI interfaces, chat applications, and feedback systems where quick emoji reactions provide lightweight user feedback and engagement.
When to skip
- Every message needs detailed rationale for compliance review.
- Reactions would train on PHI or legal advice without consent.
- The UI already has mandatory structured rating on each turn.
Rules
Thumbs down with no optional “why” follow-up.
Reactions that disappear after scroll with no persisted signal.
Using reactions as the only support path for harmful output.
Emoji picker that covers the message being rated.
Evidence
| Product | Implementation |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Thumbs up/down on assistant messages with optional detail. |
| Claude | Feedback controls on responses for quality tuning. |
| Discord | Emoji reactions on bot messages in servers. |
| Slack | Emoji reactions on app and AI bot replies. |